The other day Atul Gawande tweeted the following:
I am not against checklists. When I was a surgical chairman, I implemented and used one in both the operating room and the ICU. They do not add costs and may be helpful.
However, the randomized trial that Gawande referred to does not necessarily settle the issue about whether checklists really do reduce complications and deaths.
The paper, published online in Annals of Surgery [full text here], looked at 5,295 operations done in two Norwegian hospitals. The intervention was a 20-item checklist consisting of three critical steps–the sign in before anesthesia, the timeout before the operation began, and the sign out before the surgeon left the operating room. Using a stepped wedge cluster design, patients were randomized to control or the checklist.
Complications occurred in 19.9 percent of the control patients and 11.5 percent in those who got the checklist, a significant difference with p < 0.001.
A look at Table 2 finds that of 27 complications or groups of complications, 14 occurred in significantly fewer patients in the checklist group.
Of the significant 14, a few, such as cardiac or mechanical implant complications, could possibly have been prevented by the implementation of the checklist.